Organic Food - Better or Not?

Organic Food - Better or Not?

Organic food is neither more nutritious nor any less prone to bacterial contamination than corresponding, conventionally grown foods. There has long been the tendency to conflate "organic" with "nutritious," both by individuals who are passionate advocates for organic farming and eating, and by those corporate entities that profit from the halo effect this confers. The motives of the individuals are pure and laudable, if at times overly enthusiastic. Try some organic recipe like milk fed veal chop which you can add for your diet.

Organic does not mean "nutritious," and never did. Spinach may be grown conventionally, rather than organically, but will still have the nutritional profile of spinach, which is, of course, outstanding. Gummy bears—and sugar, for that matter—may be organic, and add nothing but empty calories to your diet. consumption of organic fruits and vegetables did reduce exposure to pesticide residues by roughly 30 percent overall. For whatever it's worth, pesticide levels were generally within the allowable limits for safety for the conventionally grown foods. In the case of pure foods—such as produce, the meaning of organic is clear (grown without chemical fertilizers, herbicides, or pesticides) even if the health benefits are debatable. But when foods are assembled in recipes and packaged, then even the definitions can get murky.

Organic meat, poultry, eggs, and dairy products "come from animals that are given no antibiotics or growth hormones. Organic food is produced without using most conventional pesticides, fertilizers made with synthetic ingredients or sewage sludge, bioengineering, or ionizing radiation.

Ninety-five percent of the ingredients in such a product must be organic, but the rest can be otherwise. In products "made with organic ingredients" up to 30 percent of the content need not be. We may get the truth on a food label, but rarely the whole truth. Nutritious food is better for our health. Organic food may be as well, and it's better for the planet. So what may be best of all, systematic reviews notwithstanding, is to combine the two, whenever possible.